logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2007. 1. 26. 선고 2006고단5204,2007고단29(병합) 판결
[재물손괴][미간행]
Escopics

Defendant

Prosecutor

Isora

Defense Counsel

Attorney final mother in charge who is a law firm

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the above fine is not paid, the defendant shall be confined in a workhouse for the period calculated by converting 50,000 won into one day.

Criminal facts

The defendant is the head of the association of the Seocho-gu Distribution Complex 2 Complex Reconstruction Project Association located in 18 in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. A rebuilding association general meeting for 1,720 households of the distribution main complex 2 complex 1,720 households around July 14, 201 shall be held, and a reconstruction association shall be authorized on June 27, 2003, and project implementation on December 31, 2004 shall be authorized on December 31, 2004. However, as the existing small, medium, large, and large-type housing has changed and the sale price has increased, some of the members who did not consent to the management and disposal plan of the association were refused to move and failed to order the apartment, and the above members filed an application for provisional disposition against the above members on September 16, 2005 shall be rejected from the Seoul High Court on the ground that the above provisional disposition cannot be accepted from the Seoul High Court on September 26, 2005.

From February 206 to March 2006, 227 Dong205, and 205, which were owned by the victim non-indicted 1, the apartment owned by the victim non-indicted 1, 234 Dong 301, 238 Dong 408, 239 Dong 404, 223, 304 apartment owned by the victim non-indicted 5, 204 Dong 204, 508 owned by the victim non-indicted 6, 238 Dong 309, 2209 apartment owned by the victim non-indicted 8, 227 Dong 405, 2300, and 2312 Dong 214, 2321, and 236 Dong 214, respectively, owned by the victim non-indicted 231, 204 Dong, and 306 Dong 214, 2321, and 3214 Dong owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each complaint;

1. All on-site photographs;

Application of Statutes

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

Article 366 of the Criminal Act

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Detention in a workhouse;

Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

Judge final paths

arrow