logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
집행유예
(영문) 광주고법 1972. 5. 18. 선고 72노19 제1형사부판결 : 확정
[살인피고사건][고집1972형,44]
Main Issues

The number of crimes committed in the event that two persons are covered with a cover at one time.

Summary of Judgment

If the defendant had given birth to 2 children covered with a cover and died, it was erroneous in the judgment of the court below that the single act was committed as concurrent crimes despite the commercial concurrent crimes corresponding to several crimes.

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 40 and 250 of the Criminal Act

Escopics

Defendant

Appellant. An appellant

Prosecutor

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju District Court Decision 71 Gohap16 decided Jan. 1, 200

Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The 110 days out of the detention days prior to the pronouncement of the judgment below shall be included in the original sentence.

Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for five years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

The gist of the reason for appeal by the prosecutor is that the court below's postponement of execution of the punishment for three years against the defendant is too uneasible because the amount of the punishment is too uneasible.

However, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364 (2) and (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the judgment of the court below is reversed and the judgment of the court below is again decided as follows, because the court below's act of single act constitutes several crimes under the name of crimes. Thus, the court below's act of concurrent crimes against the so-called of the defendant constitutes violation of Acts and subordinate statutes which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

Criminal facts and evidence acknowledged as a member are the same as those indicated in the judgment of the court below, and they are cited as it is.

The court below's decision is reasonable to recognize the execution of the sentence as to the defendant under Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 5 of the Criminal Act, since the defendant is punished as a punishment under Article 40 and Article 50 (3) of the Criminal Act due to the nature of the crime and the serious crime committed during the period of imprisonment, among the cases of multiple crimes, as a single act, the defendant is punished as a punishment under Article 40 and Article 50 (3) of the same Act. Thus, the defendant shall be punished as a limited term of imprisonment within three years within the scope of the term of punishment which has been mitigated under Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 5 of the same Act. In accordance with Article 57 of the same Act, 110 days of the number of days under detention prior to the pronouncement of the court below's decision is included in the above sentence, and the defendant is pregnant as a woman of unmarried mother, and the defendant has committed the remaining punishment of this case without being married to the other party, and after the execution of the sentence becomes final and conclusive under Article 16 (1) of the above Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Choi Yong-so (Presiding Judge)

arrow