1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the case's sub-paragraph (c) of Section 2 of Section 4, Sections 2, 5, and 1 of Chapter 4 among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 402

C. In light of the above legal principles, Gap evidence 2-1, Gap evidence 2-1, Eul evidence 4-1, and the result of the court's first instance court's request for appraisal of medical records with respect to Gap's doctor C, it is reasonable to see that the life of this case constitutes "am" under the insurance terms of this case. (1) The insurance terms of this case provide that "the diagnosis confirmation of cancer shall be made by a person with a professional doctor's license for autopsy or clinical pathology," and this diagnosis shall be based on the body price or blood test." As seen above, the type of the case of this case provides that "I will make this diagnosis based on the permanent opinion about the body's fixed ttile or blood test," and the defendant's final report on autopsy's 10th path path path Math Math Math Math 3, which is the result of the plaintiff's final inspection of Math Math 3's disease.

In addition, even if the result of the court's request for the appraisal of medical records for C at the court of first instance is based on the results of the examination of the medical records examination report and diagnosis of the medical organization in the above medical records, the pattern of this case constitutes "Nuroendiode rumor, grade 1, and Carcon", and the workplace of malicious life classification among the third revised Korean Standard Disease Identification Classification.