logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.10 2015가단5224806
보험금
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) from March 11, 2015, to Plaintiff A with respect to KRW 20 million; (b) KRW 10,900,000; and (c) each of the above amounts.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs entered into an insurance contract between husband and wife, and Plaintiff A entered into each insurance contract between the Defendant and the Defendant, with Plaintiff B as the insured.

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant insurance contracts” or in the order of each of the instant insurance contracts, “No. 1 insurance contracts” and “No. 2 insurance contracts”; each of the coverage in the attached list shall be abstract only to the relevant parts of the instant

Plaintiff

After the diagnosis of B, Plaintiff B was hospitalized for nine days from January 14, 2015 to January 22, 2015 in the C Hospital located in Yanananan City, and was hospitalized for nine days at work on January 15, 2015.

On January 19, 2015, Sick doctor D requested the organizational inspection of the species removed from the part of the workplace (hereinafter “the species of this case”) at the time of surgery, based on the fluorial opinion against the Plaintiff’s organized body sludge on January 19, 2015, determined on January 1.0 x 0 0 x 0.8 cm of the size of the organizational body, and 'Carciciology: carciology; 'Carciciciologic species; 'ciciciciciologic species; 'ciciciciciciciciciant species'; - the marciciciciciciciation type, and ciciciciant species) - The results of the c hospital E operated and treated by the Plaintiff B, based on the results of the fluoral inspection, classified the ciciologic number “workplace number” as “workplace number” under the 20.

C. Around January 26, 2015, the Plaintiffs filed a claim with the Defendant for cancer diagnosis benefits, etc. as insurance money based on each of the instant insurance contracts.

However, around March 10, 2015, the Defendant did not pay cancer diagnosis benefits, while the size of the species of this case is less than 10m and is less than 1m in a state without any fladrosis, the final pathology diagnosis name corresponds to the flasing of boundary that is not malicious cancer (D37.5) and paid only the flasing-related benefits.

Therefore, the defendant is entitled to 4,00,000 won under the first insurance contract.

arrow