Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months on February 5, 2015, due to interference with the execution of official duties, etc. in the Sungnam branch support by Sungnam branch of Suwon branch of Suwon branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 4, 2015, and is currently under suspended sentence.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A

(a) No person who violates the Framework Act on Fire-Fighting shall interfere with fire-fighting activities, such as the extinguishment of fires, lifesaving, first-aid services, etc. dispatched without justifiable grounds;

On August 18, 2016, at around 11:15, the Defendant reported to 119 the Defendant’s friendship B, who was assaulted by the Defendant in the corridor located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam District, to receive medical treatment, and solicited the fire fighter F affiliated with the Sungnam Fire Station F, who was dispatched, to transfer B to the H hospital B, and the Defendant “I, without any string any string bom, talked with the Defendant, she was able to flick and flick together with the Defendant, and I, who was a fire fighting official, who was called as the Defendant, was flick with the flick of G, and was flick with the head of I.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted fire fighters dispatched for emergency service activities and interfered with emergency service activities.

B. On August 18, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, around 11:30, at the front of the E public announcement board of the above paragraph (a) above, the Defendant: (a) asked the police officer belonging to the Seongdong-gu Police Station J District of the Sung-gu Police Station, Sung-nam Police Station and the police officer L to arrest the Defendant as a current offender once immediately; and (b) opened by asking on the top of the left hand part of the K, and obstructed the legitimate performance of duties concerning the arrest of the police officer as a flagrant offender.

2. Defendant B interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of committing the act of committing the act of committing the act of committing the act of committing the act of committing the act of committing the act of committing the act of committing the act of committing the act of committing the act of committing the act of committing the act of committing the act of committing the act of committing the act of arresting

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness G, L, I,K, and M;

1. Damage photographs related to obstructing the performance of public duties;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A response to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation report (the suspended period);