logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2021.03.10 2020고단1371
자동차손해배상보장법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

When the defendant does not pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 1, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Incheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 9, 2019 after being sentenced to two years of suspended execution.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving a BT car.

On September 19, 2019, the Defendant driven a vehicle at around 23:00, and directed the front road of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C along the two-lanes between the two-lanes in the direction of the Do road in the direction of the distance of funeral in the south-gu, Seog-gu.

In this case, the defendant has a duty of care to safely drive the front left and right well, such as accurately operating the steering direction and the brake system, and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeds straight as it is, and the front part of the DO2 parked in the middle of the two-lanes and the three-lanes in the front side of the Defendant’s car was shocked with the front part of the Defendant’s car.

The Defendant did not take necessary measures, such as providing personal information to the victim, even though the occurrence of a traffic accident that damages the repair cost for which it is impossible to identify the estimate of the damage, due to such occupational negligence.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving on January 1, 201 without a driver’s license in the same manner as above at the time and place of navigation.

3. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance shall be operated on a road;

1. The Defendant owned and operated a port vehicle, and operated a vehicle without mandatory insurance as mentioned above at the time and place of a port.

Summary of Evidence

1. A written statement prepared by E, F and G of the police suspect examination record against the accused;

1. On-site and vehicle photographs, drivers' license registers, and mandatory insurance;

1. A previous conviction: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, reporting of a previous conviction, and reporting of the result thereof, and applying the text of the judgment.

arrow