We reverse the judgment of the court below.

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months and by a fine not exceeding 1,500,000 won.

The defendant above.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

Defendant (the first and second original judgment) misunderstanding of facts (the first and second original judgment), the criminal facts of paragraphs (1) and (2) (the fabrication of private documents and the uttering of a falsified Document) at the time of the original adjudication, the Defendant obtained the consent of H, the representative member of the limited partnership company G (hereinafter “G”) in the execution of an urban development project (hereinafter “instant project”) which was being promoted for the Eth day in Yangsan-si, Yangyang-si, Yangyang-si, and obtained the consent of H, the representative member of the limited partnership company G (hereinafter “G”) in the execution of the instant project, and made the original adjudication, two copies of the consignment transfer and takeover agreement in each G listed in the criminal facts of paragraph (1) at the time of the original adjudication.

The agreement (as the evidence No. 950 of the record, hereinafter referred to as the "agreement of Section 1-B of this case") written in the facts constituting the crime of Section 1-B of this case is referred to as the "Agreement of Section 1-B of this case" of this case.

[2] In the judgment of the court below, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the delegation of authority to implement the project of this case, and did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the delegation of authority to execute the project of this case. The court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the delegation of authority to execute the project of this case to the victim at the time of transfer of KRW 1 billion from the victim who was operating the company N (hereinafter "N") of this case to H. In addition, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the delegation of authority to execute the project of this case from H. In so doing, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the delegation of authority to execute the project of this case.