1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be the principal lawsuit.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the "decision as to the defendant's defense of set-off" in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is like the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【The part concerning the defendant's defense of set-off 2. 3. The defendant's defense is defense that the defendant's principal claim of the plaintiff as stated in the above 1-c. and (d) above against the plaintiff as set-off against each claim of the above 1-a. and (b) against the plaintiff. At least 1-c. the defendant's claim of KRW 41.5 million against the plaintiff as set-off against the plaintiff is set-off against the plaintiff on April 25, 2012, which is 9 months after the date of receipt of the fraternity 15.4 million from the date of receipt of the fraternity 15.4 million from the date of the above set-off 300 won after the lapse of 9 months from the date of receipt of the fraternity 1-1 and the above claim of KRW 15.30 million against the plaintiff was set-off against the plaintiff on January 25, 2013.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.