Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Criminal facts

On October 16, 2017, at around 23:30, the Defendant was arrested as a current offender of the crime of assault against the victim F, etc., who is the police officer belonging to the police unit belonging to the police unit in the Changwon-gu Police Station E District in the Changwon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, by the Defendant, prior to the C cafeteria, which is located in Sungwon-gu, Sungwon-si B, and after being reported 112 by the Defendant, the Defendant was arrested as the victim F, etc., of the police officer belonging to the police unit belonging to the police unit belonging to the police unit in the Changwon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reports and arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the climatic base that requires medical treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter “the Act”) of the Act on the Custody in the Nowon-gu Station: (a) the Defendant’s mistake was pened and reflected in depth; and (b) there are some circumstances to consider the motive and background leading to the instant crime; and (c) the means and consequence of the instant crime; (d) the circumstances and consequence of the instant crime; (e) the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, intelligence and environment; and (e) various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, including criminal records and arguments, were determined in line with the order.