logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.02.05 2014나2013554
손해배상(기)
Text

Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

Reasons

Basic Facts

At around 23:39 on April 12, 201, Defendant B neglected to turn to the right-hand left of about 40km of the F station in front of the F station in F station in Si/Gu, in accordance with the two-lanes of F station in Si/Gu, Defendant B driven the Plaintiff, who was crossinging the crosswalk to the left-hand side of the front side of the said vehicle, due to the shock of the said vehicle into the above vehicle, sustained the injury of the Plaintiff, such as the inside and rear heat, pathal spathal, the right-side spathal spathal, and the mathal spathal spathal spathal spathal spathal of the said vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident.” The Plaintiff, while drinking at the time of the instant accident, was a pedestrian stop signal while crossing the said crosswalk to the extent that the occurrence of the accident or its developments were completely unsatisfed.

The plaintiff, due to the accident in this case, is in a state that requires a periodic treatment of crypology on the part of the mouth 1 in the upper left side of the company (Ma24) in the future. The plaintiff is able to improve the number of 3 cm in length, 1.2 cm in length, 1 cm in length, 1cc in the upper end of the company, and the side of the company in the upper end (3 cm in the ma, 1.2 cm in the upper end, 1cm in the upper end, 1cm in the upper end, and 0.6 cm in the upper end x 0.6 cm in the upper end x 0.4 cm in the upper end, 2.5 cm in the upper end), but it is difficult to expect the complete loss.

Defendant C was the mother of Defendant B and the owner of the said vehicle, and was on the said vehicle at the time of the instant accident.

[Based on the facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2-1, Eul evidence 2-2, Eul evidence 6-7, Eul evidence 2-2-2, Eul evidence 12-12 and Eul evidence 2-15, the result of the physical examination commission (limited to the dental area) to the chief of the Incheon Masan Hospital at the first instance court, the result of the physical examination commission to the chief of the first instance court, and the result of the first instance court's Seoul National University Hospital's physical examination commission to the chief of the first instance court, and the purport of the whole pleading liability for damages, the defendant Eul is a tort causing the accident of this case, and the defendant C is the above vehicle under

arrow