1. The part against the plaintiff falling under the following order of payment among the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked:

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to F drivers Gone Star Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant insurance vehicle”).

B. At around 01:20 on May 25, 201, F, the Plaintiff, who walked on the crosswalk at the right side of the right side of the crosswalk when the former commercial road is proceeding along the first line from the slope of the event distance to the slope of the instant commercial activity, was shocked in front of the steering line of the Defendant insurance vehicle.

Due to the above traffic accident, the plaintiff suffered serious injury to light water (wholly damaged).

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) C.

The location of the instant accident is the straight line of 10 straight lines, and the street has been planted along the center line. The Plaintiff walked along the crosswalk while walking the crosswalk, and the pedestrian signal was red, and the F was driving the Defendant insurance vehicle in accordance with the straight line.

On the other hand, in the front direction of the defendant insurance vehicle of F, while the taxi was waiting at the fifth line of the crosswalk, the plaintiff walking along the crosswalk was also witness.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) and each of the evidence Nos. 1, 1, 5, 8, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, the court of the first instance as a result of the commission of physical appraisal to the president

2. Occurrence of liability for damages and limitation on liability;

A. In full view of the background leading up to the occurrence of the instant accident, shocking parts of the Defendant Insurance Vehicle, road features of the location of the instant accident, and witness status of other witnesses, F operated the Defendant Insurance Vehicle, and failed to perform its duty of care in front because it passed around the crosswalk, which is the place where the instant accident occurred, due to the operation of the Defendant Insurance Vehicle.

The defendant, who is the insurer of the defendant insurance vehicle, is the result of the accident of this case.