1. The Defendant’s disposition of denial of naturalization made to the Plaintiff on September 30, 2016 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

- D is written twice a month from October 24, 2015 to October 27, 2016, on the two occasions, February 4, March 1, and March 3, and March 2, 2016, but on the other hand, on the basis of the details of the payment of user fees, it appears that it would be twice a month and once a March 4 and once a month, respectively;

D - On April 1, May 1, July 1, October 4, 100 and visited 14 times in total during the latest one year (one day at the time of Daejeon), D - one half of a month that mainly stays in a nationwide region because of the power plant boiler equipment, Nitter fishing, and works short in terms of the nature of the work, and the head of Daejeon located in the Incheon House where F is located, - lack of exchange of the two persons who are in possession of D on May 1, 29, 29, 100, 14 October, 296, 100, 14 October, 24, 2007, 200, 14 October, 14, 2001).

- The telephone communications content 1/2 was made when D visited the Daejeon House, and it was left before and after the filing date of the application for extension of the period of stay between the plaintiff and B – The Korean history is very insufficient, and D also communicates with both women due to lack of Chinese history, and it seems that D does not actively notify the relatives of the marriage with B due to the negative perceptions surrounding the international marriage, D does not have any exchange between D and their children, against the opposite of D's children, and the transfer of B to Daejeon without any relationship between D's proposal for workplace rent K, while D and their income are managed respectively, D are raising a child marriage fund.