logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.01.28 2014고단3240
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A fine of 5,00,000 won shall be imposed for the crimes of No. 2 in the judgment of the defendant with respect to the crimes of No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 7, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Ulsan District Court on February 15, 2014 and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 15, 2014.

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

1. Around August 21, 2013, the Defendant purchased and sold approximately 0.7g of psychotropic drugs from friendly job offering D in cash with KRW 1,00,000,000.

2. At around 10:00 on July 7, 2014, the Defendant administered 0.05g of philopon in E liquid sports vehicles parked on the road near the construction site of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, by means of dilution with water and injection to the left part of the Defendant’s left part.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of the police statement concerning F;

1. Investigation report (Attachment to D or A telephone details);

1. A written appraisal;

1. Investigation report (verification of price of philophones transaction);

1. Before judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports (final report of judgment);

1. Each choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes under Articles 60(1)2, 4(1)1, and 2 subparag. 3(b)-1 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. under the pertinent provision of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and fine for the crimes under Article 2 of the holding

1. The latter part of Articles 37 and 39 (1) of the Criminal Act (the crime of Article 1 at the time of marketing and the theft between the crimes in which judgment becomes final and conclusive);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. Although the defendant with the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order has the ability to punish him for the same crime, the crime of Article 1 of the judgment is simultaneously with larceny for which the judgment becomes final and conclusive

arrow