logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2017.02.02 2016고정64
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a Clearning car.

On June 18, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 15:45, and driven the D road in front of the Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, in front of the D road at the intersection of the Dong-ri, the intersection of the Dong-ri, the intersection of which is about 50km per hour, depending on the intersection of the Dong-ri.

At this point, there was a center line of yellow solid lines, so the driver engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly look at the front line and the right and the right of the motor vehicle and to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent the traffic accident in advance.

Despite such fact, the Defendant neglected to do so and went through due to negligence while driving a central line.

E Driving

Franchis caused the difference between driving seats of the Franchis and the driver's seats of the Franchising car, and the franchise's car was rapid due to the above traffic accident.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim G (Woo, 35 years old) who was on board a franchise-free car due to the above occupational negligence, including approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (after-accident) caused a traffic accident as set forth in the above 1.1., thereby damaging the franchis to repair the 183,620 won of the franchising car, and runs away without immediately stopping the vehicle and without taking necessary measures.

Although the instant accident led to only minor physical damage caused by the instant accident, it appears that the fluor was not scattered on the road.

However, even though the defendant has caused a traffic accident, he was stopped immediately and proceeded without confirming whether or not there is any damage, and it is judged that not only the defendant could have caused another traffic danger and trouble by driving away the defendant who escaped.

Therefore, the defendant is governed by Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow