logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.19 2017고정2337
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives Bran vehicle.

On June 9, 2017, around 08:25, the Defendant, at the time of driving on the above vehicle, was driving the center line in the direction of the folk village distance from the ero-dong bank in the direction of the ero-dong 3-distance from the ero-dong bank.

As the center line is installed, drivers have a duty of care to pass along the right side of the center line, and in the event of traffic accidents, drivers have a duty of care to immediately rescue the injured of stopping and remove the risk of additional traffic accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant driven along the center line and driven along the station, and the vehicle and its own vehicle standing on the right side of its own right side, even though a large number of vehicles stopped in the signal atmosphere, are driving along close to one another. On the same direction, the occurrence of a traffic accident requiring repair cost of KRW 118,00,00 for the victim C (30, n, n) driving the vehicle driving from one lane in the same direction to the right side of the vehicle due to the collision between the Defendant’s vehicle and the victim’s left side of the vehicle, but the vehicle was parked on the road without checking the injured or removing non-products from the road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Ctv image images of a closure;

1. Written estimate of damage;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 148 of the relevant Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act appears to be against the Defendant’s wrong recognition and the degree of damage, and agreement with the victim.

arrow