The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

According to the records, the court below sentenced the defendant who was under detention without a defense counsel in this case, not a requisite attorney-at-law. There is no violation of the procedure for the appointment of a public defender or infringement of the defendant's right to defense.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.