The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

According to the records, the court below sentenced the defendant who was under detention without a defense counsel in the case of this case, which is not a requisite attorney-at-law, and then appointed a state appointed defense counsel immediately after he sentenced the defendant to the punishment without a defense counsel. There is no violation of Articles 33(1) and 282 of the Criminal Procedure Act or violation of the defendant's right of defense or the right

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.