logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.06.26 2013고단83
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 20:30 on January 7, 2013, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim D (n, 44 years of age) in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, “E” c; (b) expressed the victim F and the victim G (e.g., 52 years of age) who was drinking in the above heading house while under the influence of alcohol; and (c) expressed the victim D’s desire to take the victim out of the above heading house on the ground that the victim D, who is the business owner of “E, was likely to be fighting days; and (d) expressed the victim D’s desire to take the victim out of the above heading house, “I am this year, four years of age, and four years of age,” and then, after entering the victim’s right neck with the victim’s hand floor, the Defendant brought the victim G again into the above heading house with the victim’s desire to do the same during the same year, and then embling the victim G’s chest over 1).

2. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Assault of a group, deadly weapon, etc.) committed assault against the victim when the victim got out of the victim F (58cm in length) on the same date and time as that of paragraph (1), at the same place, and at the same time as that of “E” (48cm in length), but when the victim avoided it, the victim was able to take out the face of the victim once again.

3. From January 7, 2013 to 21:00 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business by force obstructing the victim’s door-line business by avoiding disturbance, such as the victim’s and the customers, including G and F, in the above door-line, who were in the victim’s and the above door-line, expressed a large amount of desire for the customers, and booming the chair and the chair.

4. The obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant’s injury are as follows: (a) on the ground that the police officer I, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report from 112 that the Defendant frightet was fright at the “E” head box, i.e., the Seoul Western Police Station H District of the Seoul Western Police Station, i.e., e., e., the Defendant and the Defendant were brupted on the ground that the police officer I frighted and frighted to fright the Defendant.”

arrow