The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On August 23, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for the obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on August 31, 2018, and is still still under suspended sentence.

Around 04:05 on June 2, 2019, the Defendant, while drinking and drinking at “C” house located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, while taking a bath to other general customers, took a bath to the victim D (22 years of age) who is the customer, without any justifiable reason, she took one time at the victim E (22 years of age) who is an employee of the above head office (22 years of age) who prevents him/her from taking care of the victim’s right, and continued to take one time at around 05:30 on the same day, the victim F (25 years of age) who is an employee of the above head office, suffered damage from other customers, and was able to take part in the victim F (25 years of age)’s head and face, and the body of the victim F.

B. On June 2, 2019, from around 04:05 to around 05:30, the Defendant obstructed the victim F and E’s heading business by force, such as assaulting customers at the same place as the above mentioned in paragraph (1), raising them, and taking a bath, etc., thereby making a part of customers in the way of playing, and allowing them to file complaints from customers.

C. On June 2, 2019, around 05:38, the Defendant: (a) expressed to the police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the Seoul Western Police Station G District G District, who was dispatched to the site after receiving 112 report that “the guest fright fright fright fright fright; and (b) expressed that “the fright fright fright fright,” “the fright fright fright,” “the fright fright fright,” and sent a warning to the fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties on the 112 report duty.

2. According to the records, since the facts of death of the defendant around April 25, 2020 are recognized, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 328(1)2 of the Criminal Procedure Act.