beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of one thousand won,00,000 won.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A
A. A. On August 15, 2015, the Defendant infringed on a structure (i) around 12:03 around August 15, 2015, the Defendant came into a G factory operated by the Victim F in Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, and intruded the structure managed by the victim by entering the factory through an open entrance with an intention to steals property.
2) The thief Defendant: (a) invadedd the aforementioned temporary location at the foregoing time, and then stolen 10 thiefs with 1,200,000 won at the market price, which was the victim’s possession in the factory; and (b) stolen them.
B. On March 26, 2016, around 12:02, around March 26, 2016, the Defendant intruded into a structure that was managed by the victim by entering the factory inside the G factory operated by the above victim F, with the open entrance, by thefting property, and intrusion upon the structure managed by the victim.
2) The thief Defendant: (a) invadedd the aforementioned date, time, and place; and (b) stolen 210 thief tools in plastic boxes, which amount to KRW 8,379,00, the market value of the victim-owned in the factory; and (c) stolen them.
2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in the trade of tools with the trade name called “I” at H in Busan High-ro.
At around 12:40 on March 26, 2016, the Defendant purchased 210 pieces of 8,379,000 won at the market price of the victim F that he stolen from A.
In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the trade of heavy tools, has a duty of care to confirm the personal information about A and describe the acquisition of the tools and the details of the acquisition of the tools, the motive for the sale, and the price suitable for the transaction price, etc., and to verify whether or not the tools have been stolen.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to pay such attention and neglected to determine the stolen water, thereby purchasing 2.10 of the above Section 2,150,000 Won by negligence.
Ultimately, the Defendant acquired stolen goods by occupational negligence as above.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ each.