logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.02.17 2015고단2094
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 20, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for six months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving) in the Gwangju District Court's Net Branch on May 20, 2015, and was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on May 28, 2015, and is currently under suspension of execution.

1. The defendant is a person who drives a Do motor vehicle in violation of the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving).

On October 8, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car at a section of about 500 meters in a state of alcohol alcohol content of about 0.050% while under the influence of a vehicle without a driver’s license, from the front of the wireless screen fright in the cream in the male and female chill.

2. Illegal uttering of official documents was made by the Defendant due to a transactional relationship in order to conceal the condition that he was driving of the said vehicle due to drinking alcohol orless driving without a license on the front of the second apartment house in front of the 2nd apartment house, which is in the scambling of the scambling of the scambling of the remaining at the time of the day set forth in paragraph (1).

The F's driver's license certificate in the name of the F was presented as one's own, and the official document was used unlawfully.

3. The Defendant: (a) accessed the date and time of paragraph (2) of the foregoing paragraph; (b) at a place where the traffic police officer’s guard E connected to the traffic police network to PDA; (c) entered F’s personal information, and violations; and (d) signed F’s name in the signature column to put the Defendant into the column for the driver’s signature upon presenting the PDA to put the Defendant’s signature.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged another person’s signature on the PDA device without authority to inquire about the result of regulating drinking driving.

4. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the above paragraph (3) above, shall be subject to the traffic management guidance of the relevant police station, who is aware of the forgery.

arrow