The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant on the summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment with prison labor and three years of suspended sentence) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is an indecent act committed by the victim with the victim who frighten and frighten together with the victim who frighten and frighten together with the victim, and the nature of the crime is very poor. The crime of this case seems to have been committed by the victim who frighten and was under significant mental impulse, but the fact that the victim was believed to have been under significant mental impulse, but did not receive a letter from the victim until now, is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, considering the following as a whole: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects his mistake in depth; (b) the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment so far; (c) the Defendant’s age constitutes a stable relationship with young and his family members; (d) the Defendant’s parents are leading the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant’s age, sex, family relationship, and the circumstances after the Defendant committed the instant crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court’s sentence is too uneasible and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.