1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 139,624,451; and (b) KRW 3,00,000; and (c) KRW 1,00,000 for the Plaintiff C and D, respectively.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff A is the owner and driver of the E Twitter (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff Twitter"), and the defendant is the owner of the F seter (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant").

B. At around 16:40 on August 31, 2015, G, the Defendant’s user, was driving a Defendant digging pool at the next International Bank located in Gangseo-gu, Busan, Busan, to destroy it on the spot and to move it to another site, and the Plaintiff’s Tracker’s Tracker’s Tracker’s Tracker’s soil from the left side of the Defendant digging Kacker’s Kacker’s left side to be cut off, and the Plaintiff’s lacing part was pushed down into the track of the Kacker’s surface (hereinafter “instant accident”), thereby causing injury, such as cutting the left part of the Hacker’s hand, cutting the left part, cutting the front side part of the lacing part, and cutting the lacing part of the lac on the left side, etc. (hereinafter “instant injury”).

C. On January 19, 2016, G was indicted for violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Act No. 2016Da375) with respect to the instant accident, and the trial of the first instance is in progress.

Plaintiff

B is the denial of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are the children of Plaintiff A.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6, 13, Eul evidence 5 and video (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the facts of recognition of liability and the above evidence and the statements in the evidence Nos. 3 and 6 above, the accident of this case occurred by negligence on the part of the plaintiff Tracker's Tracker without sufficiently examining G's left and left. Thus, the defendant is the owner of a Gacker and is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the traffic accident of this case pursuant to Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, unless there are special circumstances.

B. Limitation of liability, provided that the Plaintiff.