beta
Text
1. Defendant C’s KRW 70,00,00, and KRW 420,565,959 to Plaintiff A, and each of the said money from July 14, 2018.
Reasons
The grounds for the determination against Defendant C are as shown in the attached Form of the claim.
Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (amended by Service by Public Notice) of the applicable provisions of the Act on the Civil Procedure (amended by Act No. 208(3) is a person who actually establishes E for the purpose of leasing and managing construction equipment, Defendant D was a representative director in the name of E with children of Defendant C, and worked in the above company.
The Plaintiffs purchased each digging machine listed in the attached table (hereinafter “each digging machine of this case”) and leased it to Defendant C around that time.
Each of the excavations of this case is currently traded to, or is impossible to, a third party at the present time, and the used value of each of the excavations of this case is as stated in the corresponding column of "highest price" in the attached Table.
Defendant C issued a warrant of arrest as of May 29, 2015, and several recommendations are confirmed, and the whereabouts of Defendant C is unknown after escape.
【In light of the fact that there is no dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 8, 25, Eul's evidence No. 3, and the plaintiffs' assertion to the purport of the whole pleadings, the plaintiffs are directors of defendant Eul Co., Ltd., and defendant Eul received the purchase price for each of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of this case from the plaintiffs, or paid the plaintiffs operating profits of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of this case to the accounts of Eul or defendant D at the time of receiving the purchase price for each of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of this case to the plaintiff Eul, and the registration number Nos. 1 through 8, 25, and 3 were not identified after the transfer of ownership to Eul during the of the of the of the of the of the above case to the plaintiff.