A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had been sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. at the Daegu District Court on June 20, 2013, when the Defendant had been sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.; (b) did not keep the victim C as the meaning of a civil action with the victim C, the victim C and his/her dependent, and the victim E, who had been married with the victim, were able to threaten the victims through a fluencing letter or telephone to the victim E.

At around 18:30 on October 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) expressed in 102 Dong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, about 102, that “I wish to be a woman more than once for 18 years; (b) I want to know that I have to do so; (c) for example, I would like to see that I would like to have a part of the operation. I sent it to the victim C by means of mail No. 502; and (d) threatened the victims at a total of seven times in the city of Daegu, etc., such as the list of crimes, from the time to April 3, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, C, and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each letter and recording book;

1. Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommendations] the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act / [the decision of sentence / the defendant is in the period of probation as the same military force against the same victim (Provided, That the current period of probation is limited).