The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant: (a) was a spouse; (b) was the victim C (the 31-year old-old-age-old-age-old-her-her-her-her-her-her-her-her-her-her-child-her-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-and-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child

Sending the Kakao Stockholm text message stating that “If you know that there are different different photographs from one test, I would like to do so,” “I would like to do so,” “I would like to do so,” “I would like to see the substance of the Kakao Stockholm,” and “I would like not to know the truth of the Kakao Stockholm, I would like to know about the Kakao Stockholm text.”

The former husband, consciousness, and workplace club of the victimized person notified the injured person of the harm that he would not have been able to do so, and notified the injured person of the harm as if he would show a son’s photo.

나. 명예훼손 피고인은 2017. 3. 30. 경 서울 강남구 부근에서, 피해 자가 전 남편인 F과 이혼하기 전 피고인과 잠자리한 것을 기화로 피고인의 카카오 톡 프로 필 사진에 피해자의 얼굴 일부분이 드러난 사진을 올리고 사진에 포스트잇으로 ‘G 꺼’( 피고인의 개명 전 이름 )라고 기재하고, ‘H 사거리 역 공인 중개사사무소 C 실장 진실은 밝혀진다’, ‘ 이혼 전부터 처녀 라 뻥 까고 바람 피고’, ‘C 실장 독종 VS 독종’ 이라는 글을 올려 공연히 사실을 적시하여 피해자의 명예를 훼손하였다.

2. Determination and conclusion

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intimidation) and Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of defamation);

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act, Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act;

C. The victim on July 27, 2017