logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.04.11 2017누32106
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following additions to the written judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

C. Foods

A. At the end of the second third part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on March 3, 2016, but the said objection was dismissed on the same ground as on September 9, 2016.”

B. Part II of the judgment of the court of first instance [based grounds for recognition] is added to the column of No. 1 to No. 4.

C. The third part of the judgment of the court of first instance shows that “Incompetence” in the first part of the judgment of the court of first instance is “abrupted to be able to be protected by requesting relief from Liberia’s judicial body.”

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow