Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 00:40 on September 7, 2016, at the victim D’s house located in Jeju-si, demanded a decision by the victim; (b) the market price, which is the victim’s possession, was the floor of the foundation of the foundation of the foundation of the foundation of the foundation of the foundation of the foundation of the non-merchants; (c) cutting down a sloping bridge with a sloping bridge, and then, (d) destroyed the ties with a television, and (e) destroyed the accompanying parts.

2. The Defendant, at around 00:40 on September 7, 2016, take up KRW 6,000 in cash from a sprink, which is owned by the victim at the victim’s house located in an inner display room, at the victim’s house described in the preceding paragraph.

At around 02:00 on the following day, he/she again stolen approximately KRW 20,00 from the said low-water reservoir with a face value of KRW 20,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. An investigation report (an investigation and a summary report on the recording of a victim's telephone, a criminal investigation report ( a report on the hearing of a victim's telephone statement), a criminal investigation report ( a report on hearing a victim's telephone statement related to damage to property), and a criminal investigation report (a report on verifying

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to related photographic data;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (a point of destruction of property) and Article 329 of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on June 9, 2016, when the defendant was sentenced to one year of suspension of execution on June 17, 2016 due to interference with the performance of official duties, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 17, 2016, and commits each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the fact that the defendant committed the crimes of this case during the period of suspension of execution, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant.

However, there was a dispute between the defendant and the victim with whom he had committed the crime of this case, and then the defendant paid 1.5 million won to the victim and paid 1.5 million won.