logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2015.09.24 2015고단865
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendants are those engaged in driving cars in the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the Road Traffic Act, and the Road Traffic Act;

On April 23, 2015, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at a speed of 23:00, and driven the front road of the “E” main point in Gangnam-si D in the direction of the forest intersection, along the two-lanes in the direction of the forest intersection.

At the time, the driver of the motor vehicle was at night and at the same time a two-way lane, so the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to change the vehicle by operating direction direction, etc. when changing the vehicle, giving prior notice of change of course and taking into account the traffic situation of the front and rear left, and thereby making it possible to change the vehicle line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the collision between the front wheeler and the front wheeler of the vehicle driven by the victim F(53 years old) who was normally driven by the victim F(53 years old) in the same room due to the negligence of changing the fleet to the left-hand side.

As a result, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt dynasium in need of treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, avoided repair costs of KRW 729,658, such as the exchange of front dynas, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim, while destroying and damaging a rocketing car to the point of time.

2. Despite the fact that the Defendant is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the Defendant operated the freight vehicle even the above CCo, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at approximately 460 meters in approximately 460 meters from the front and front roads of Gangseo-si, Macheon-si, Mancheon-si, or the front and front roads of Gangseo-si, 2868-ro 8.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow