A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 17, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution for violating the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act at the Daejeon District Court on July 17, 2019, and the judgment was finalized on July 25, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving B cargo vehicles.

On May 11, 2019, at around 07:47, the Defendant runs the three-lanes from the parallel parallel to the parallel parallel from the parallel parallel to the parallel, along the four-lanes in front of Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon.

In this case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to take the front side and the left side and the left side well, and to accurately operate the steering and brake system so that the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to change the course

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and neglected to change the fourth lane from the third lane to the fourth lane, and received the back portion of the victim E-motor vehicle F. F. M. F. M. driving on the left side of the driver's vehicle of the victim E-S. from the third lane.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the said rocketing car by negligence in the course of performing its duties, which is equivalent to KRW 750,000,000 for repairing costs.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) from the date and time limit set forth in paragraph (1) to the roads near the Defendant’s house located in Dong-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, through I neighboring roads located in He, Daejeon-gu, to the roads near the D referred to in paragraph (1) without a driver’s license.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is the owner of B Poter Cargo.

No motor vehicle owner shall operate any motor vehicle on the road on which mandatory insurance is not subscribed.

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the above cargo truck which was not covered by mandatory insurance on the road stated in Paragraph 2 of the temporary border stipulated in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement;