The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as stated in the facts charged, did not threaten the victim as stated in the facts charged.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty is erroneous and has affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (two million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court stated that: (a) the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of fact: (b) the victim sent a photo of the victim and his/her male-child body to another person on August 30, 2015 by taking into consideration the victim’s male-child body in the investigative agency and the lower court court’s trial to the effect that (a) the victim saw the victim as a male-child body; and (b) the victim sent a photo of the victim and his/her male-child body to another person, without considering the victim’s himself/herself.

(1) The court shall send the photo of the body to another person without having repaid the borrowed money.

The statement made to the effect that the defendant sent the body photographs and the statement on the process of threatening the victim is relatively specific and consistent; ② the defendant sent the victim's body photographs to D around September 14, 2015; ② around 06:00 on September 14, 2015, the defendant sent the victim's body photographs to the victim's mother; on the same day, around 05:24-05:32, the victim sent the victim's face and the photo from the upper half of the victim's family-friendly body; ③ the defendant sent the victim's face and the photo from the victim's upper half of the body; ③ in the court of the court of the court of the court of the court of the court, the defendant stated that "I would know how I would not pay the money."

In full view of the facts stated in the judgment of the court below, the facts that the defendant threatened the victim shall be sufficiently recognized, and the judgment of the court below that convicted the defendant of the facts charged of this case shall be determined.