logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.08.24 2015가합501819
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff entered into the instant contract 1) Hyundai item corporation (hereinafter referred to as “the present item”).

2) The construction of the wastewater treatment facilities (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction”) in the Songsan 2 General Industrial Complex

(2) On June 28, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to enter into an agreement with the reactivity emitting air to be installed at the said construction site (the wastewater treatment facility is a facility that treats wastewater using micro-organism, and it is a machine that inhales air with different wind content in the reaction to ensure the smooth production of micro-organisms; hereinafter referred to as “the transmitted air of this case”) for the price of 117,70,000 won (including value-added tax) and the period of production and delivery from June 29, 2012 to September 20, 2012, with the content that the Plaintiff would be produced and supplied from the Defendant by setting three years after the completion of the warranty period (hereinafter referred to as “instant contract”).

3) The main contents of the instant contract are as follows. [The manufacture of the goods to be supplied under Article 2 of the Terms of Contracts shall be made and supplied in accordance with the supplementary drawings, specifications and other instructions upon the direction of the supervisor nominated by the Plaintiff and the business owner.

Article 3 When the defendant intends to supply goods, he/she shall notify the plaintiff in advance and undergo an examination by the tallyman designated by the plaintiff, and shall exchange the defective goods as the result of the examination with the defendant's expenses.

Article 11. Handling of defects during the period of defect shall be exchanged, replaced, and restored to the original state on the responsibility of the defendant, and the deposit deposited in violation of this provision shall be reverted to the plaintiff.

Article 13 In cases where the defendant's failure to supply goods within the payment period led to gross negligence in the plaintiff's relevant process, or where damage was incurred due to a defect in the product, the amount equivalent thereto shall be immediately reimbursed to the plaintiff.

provided, however, that the amount of damages.

arrow