logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.06.26 2017고단3417
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant became aware of the victim E who entered a new party due to health problems as a person who operates a new party in his/her trade name in Ansan-si, the Gu C underground 101.

1. The Defendant, around August 2015, at the G new town located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, “F, a female living together, borrowed KRW 20 million from another person due to the shortage of operating funds to operate the shop in Ansan, and paid interest of KRW 40-5 million per month.

If a high interest rate is to be paid, 20 million won shall be lent. The interest of 200,000 won shall be given every month and the payment shall be made within several months.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, if the defendant's living together borrowed 10 million won from his own person's own person's own person's own person's own person's own person's own person's own person's own person's own person's own person's own person's own person's loan of 20 million won from the injured person's person's person's own person's own person's person's own person's own person's person's own person's own person's person's own person's person's own person's person's own person's own person's person's person's own person's person

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was delivered 20 million won a check under the pretext of the borrowed money by the victim around that time.

2. On January 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would have entrusted the victim with the repair of the J, who would reside in K, and would have been able to pay the victim money in the form of Native personnel expenses, etc. to perform the construction work.”

However, the fact is that the defendant received money as above such as personnel expenses, etc., and there was no intention or ability to pay it as personnel expenses.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received cash of KRW 2 million from the victim on the pretext of personnel expenses, etc. around that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant;

arrow