1. The defendant shall be dissolved;

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

The facts of the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim are as indicated in the attached Form. The Defendant is present on the second date for pleading on December 19, 2019 and stated that there is no objection against the Plaintiff’s request for dissolution, and it does not clearly dispute the Plaintiff’s assertion by failing to submit a written reply until the closing of argument. Thus, it is deemed that the Defendant led to confession under the main sentence of Article 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act

Therefore, the defendant is dissolved.

(1) Article 517 subparag. 1, Article 227 subparag. 6, Article 542(1) and Article 252 of the Commercial Act, Article 117(2) and Article 119 of the Non-Contentious Case Litigation Procedure Act, etc., although the plaintiff and the defendant are seeking to appoint a liquidator on the second date of pleading on December 19, 2019, the court shall appoint a liquidator at the request of an interested party or prosecutor or ex officio when the corporation is dissolved by a court ruling. In this case, the court shall appoint a liquidator at the request of an interested party or prosecutor or ex officio. In this case, the court's claim for the appointment of a liquidator is a non-litigation case, and it cannot be claimed as a non-litigation case, and the non-contentious case and the litigation case shall not be combined with the claim belonging to the non-contentious case. Accordingly, the defendant's liquidator shall not be appointed in this judgment, but the plaintiff may request a separate non-contentious case after the dissolution of the defendant, which is so accepted.