logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2012.05.10 2011노2695
건설산업기본법위반
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

C A fine shall be imposed for each of the crimes listed in [Attachment C] No. 1 to 5] of the List of Offenses.

Reasons

(1) Defendant C only participated in receipt, supplied materials and supplied them to the public. The construction cost was paid after deducting only necessary expenses. (9) Defendant C directly paid to its father in 207, and in 2008, Defendant C paid labor cost on the basis of various tax invoices, copies of deposit passbooks, etc. (10) from Defendant B’s office on June 15, 2009 with regard to “F court 315 legal subcontract,” which was concluded on 209.0 and later on February 26, 2009, Defendant C’s statement of payment from Defendant C’s office was discovered to the effect that “the F court 315 legal subcontract,” which was signed on 200 and later on February 26, 2009, was included in “the F court 30 and later on February 3, 2009” as “the instant documents related to the construction work, which were seized by Defendant B’s office, to the end of the 20th anniversary of the instant contractual construction work.”

arrow