Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Punishment of the crime

At around 08:30 March 2, 2016, the Defendant was a person who is engaged in driving the CBa car, and the E ahead of the E, which is located in C, at the net city D on March 22, 2016, was straighted at a speed equivalent to the speed of 89.9km per hour from the surface of the pung-do road along the one-lane road.

Since there is a section with a restricted speed of 60km a speed and a three-distance intersection, there was a duty of care to safely drive a motor vehicle with a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving the motor vehicle is obliged to observe the restricted speed and to safely drive the motor vehicle before entering the intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the above duty of care and was negligent in proceeding with a speed exceeding about 29.9km, and the victim F (the age of 67) who gets left to the left to the left to the left to the left from the fright-side of the fright-on-road drive from the fright-on-road side of the Gright-on-road car operated by the Defendant.

The Defendant, by its occupational negligence, caused the above victim FF to suffer injury, such as the left-hand feld aggregate, which requires medical treatment for about 12 weeks, and the victim H (13 years old) and I (9 years old) who is the passenger of the Defendant’s vehicle, to suffer from the injury, such as dump salt, which requires medical treatment for about 2 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant’s legal statement

A traffic accident occurrence report, a traffic accident actual condition investigation report, and an on-site evidence photographic traffic accident analysis report, respectively, shall be governed by statutes.

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.

3. Selection of an alternative fine;

4. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

5. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) is significantly heavy.

However, there is an accident that the defendant reflects the mistake.