A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(b) the defendant;

Punishment of the crime

On September 20, 2016, when the Defendant came to know of the victim C (V, 40 years of age) and his son around September 20, 2016, the Defendant saw the victim to have her son around October 7, 2016, but her husband was able to receive money from the victim, considering the victim's her husband's her son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son.

1. Suppression;

A. On October 31, 2016, the Defendant stated that “I will see all the husbands that I want to her husband, who is known to another male, and we have come to his husband, at a place in the middle of the o’clock of the o’clock of October 31, 2016.” On the same day, the Defendant displayed the photograph of the Defendant and the victim present in the Eerc shop located on the first floor of the Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, 15:00, and

I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am.

It is also known that there are many other males, and there are also some materials, and how to send them to the husband's test.

지금 여기서 찍힌 사진처럼 다른 자료도 내가 다 가지고 있는데 누나가 발뺌할까 봐 그런 거야, 1,000만 원을 주면 자료를 모두 지워 주겠다” 라며 피해자의 남편에게 피고 인과의 관계를 알릴 듯한 태도로 피해자에게 겁을 주었다.

On November 1, 2016, the Defendant received delivery of KRW 10 million to the post office account in the name of the Defendant around November 1, 2016 from the victim who frighted the victim and frighted the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant received property by threatening the victim.

B. On November 6, 2016, the Defendant requires money to seek “Saero medicine (Supplementary System) from the Thailand to the victim at the G coffee shop located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheongju on November 6, 2016.

The victim seems to be aware of the husband of the victim's relationship between the victim and the defendant, in the absence of any compliance with the provision of "the calculation of tax base", even though lurty is treated as "the value of tax base".