The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Fact-finding misunderstanding (as to the facts charged in the 2016 High Order 7328, the Defendant only called 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's ''' as a mixed standard, and there was no desire for 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's '',' and 's 's '

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of each part of the facts charged is erroneous.

B. The punishment of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On August 22, 2016, the Defendant, at around 17:20, 17:20 on the part of the facts charged (a summary of this part of the facts charged) the Defendant, at around 17:20 on August 22, 2016, listened to the statement of the witness, such as E, from the police box affiliated with the police box of the Suwon-gu Police Station D, Suwon-gu, the victim, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 on the street in front of the Suwon-gu, and confirmed whether he expressed a desire for the Defendant, and thereby, the Defendant was “the victim of this weather Hah and then put it down into this Hah, and is the opening of the Republic of Korea.”

나) 공무집행 방해 및 상해 피고 인은 위 가) 항 기재 일시, 장소에서 위 가) 항 기재와 같이 피해자 E에게 욕설을 하였고, 이에 피해 자가 피고인에게 모욕죄 현행 범인으로 체포함을 고지하자 갑자기 4 차로 도로에 뛰어들어 피해자, 현장에 출동한 순경 G이 피고인의 안전을 위하여 피고인의 팔을 붙잡자 갑자기 양손으로 피해자의 가슴 부위를 밀치고 발로 피해자의 오른쪽 정강이 부위를 걷어찼으며, 피해자에게 침을 뱉는 등 폭행하여 피해자에게 약 2 주간의 치료가 필요한 우측 하지 경골 근위 부의 타박상 및 염좌의 상해를 가하였다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time injured the victim.

2) Specific determination A) Defluence is given.