The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the charges is the inspector who carried out the motor vehicle inspection of the small truck E with the Director of the Inspection Station of the Dmotor Vehicle Industrial Institute located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, which is designated as a designated maintenance business operator for motor vehicle inspection.

In conducting the motor vehicle inspection, the inspection officer of a designated maintenance business operator for the motor vehicle inspection shall measure the specifications of the motor vehicle among the items of inspection of the motor vehicle according to the "standards and method for inspection of the motor vehicle".

(i)verification in the condition that it is identical to the specifications listed in the Motor Vehicle Specifications, and after measuring the weight of the vehicle by measuring the weight of the vehicle, verify the motor vehicle safety standards, such as whether the weight of the motor vehicle of a small truck exceeds the permissible error (Article 115 of the Motor Vehicle Safety Rules) and then record the results thereof in the motor vehicle inspection report of the electronic data processing system (the motor vehicle inspection integration system, vims, hereinafter the same shall apply) and determine the conformity with the results of the inspection;

Nevertheless, on June 18, 2013, the Defendant: (a) conducted a regular inspection of motor vehicles E with vehicle weight of 1,800 kilograms (including selective driving weight); (b) the maximum loading capacity (1,000km) - passenger capacity (3 passengers x 65km =195km); and (c) the permissible number of passengers ± 60 km [60 km] as a result of the inspection of the items for measurement of the vehicle’s specifications verified that the vehicle weight was not in excess of the safety standards with vehicle weight of 2,52 km; (b) as a result of the regular inspection of motor vehicles by an electronic information processing organization, the Defendant made a regular inspection of motor vehicles by recording the suitability and determination of passing the inspection and making it illegitimate.

2. The following circumstances found by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court: <1> Attached Table 15 of the Enforcement Rule of the Motor Vehicle Management Act

1.(a)

According to subsections.