1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 38,737,600, and 5% per annum from January 3, 2016 to February 1, 2017, and the next day.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 31, 2015, and December 7, 2015, the Plaintiff was supplied with a finger belt (hereinafter “instant labelling”) affixed to the television protection film consisting of KRW 470,000, each of 235,000, respectively, from the Defendant.

B. The Plaintiff, who received the instant labels from the Defendant, attached the instant labels to the protective films, supplied them to the Non-Party Scare Electronic and D, and the said Non-Party Company again supplied them to the Non-Party ELE Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ELE”).

C. The instant labels are divided into the part of the start section and the part of the non-point section without any contact arrangement at 60 meters in length (±1 meters in length), and 20 meters in width (±0.5 meters in error). There was a defect in which part of the starting part remains left (hereinafter “the instant defect”), and the ice friet was built on the television products using the protective film attached with the instant labels.

The contents of the defect of this case are as follows:

On January 3, 2016, the Plaintiff was notified of the instant defect by ELJ. From January 4, 2016 to January 11, 2016, the Plaintiff conducted inventory inspection and the part of the end portion of the labelling of this case by inserting human resources from January 4, 2016 to the end of January 11, 2016, replaced the labelling and the protection film by new ones. The Plaintiff cleaned the products contaminated by the blackout.

The plaintiff paid 38,737,600 won in total by performing these work.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 6 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. If so, unless there are special circumstances, the Defendant, who supplied the Plaintiff with the instant labelling, is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the defect in the instant labelling.

B. The defendant's assertion and judgment (1) the defendant's assertion are as follows.

① Defendant 1