logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2020.02.14 2017나15583
매매대금반환 등
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

A. Article 2-3 of the instant sales contract provides that “The specifications of the instant machinery correspond to the specifications of the quotation.” When testing and cutting the steel plate using the instant machinery, a written estimate attached to the instant sales contract (hereinafter “written estimate”) is attached to the cut steel plate.

(B) There was an error outside the scope of error as set out in the instant sales contract. The instant machines fall short of the specifications or performance set forth in the instant sales contract, and thus, are defective. (b) In the instant estimates, the instant estimates stipulate as follows with respect to the specifications of the instant machines:

Written Estimate The machines of this case

1. Dody and Strucure 10) Blody and flacure 10) Blody flody flody flody flody flody flody flody flody flody flody : 【 45 m (Malidy flody flody) 19m (a level) Acuraccy flody flody flody: 【 0.3m m/ 10m flodys flodys flodys flody flody flody flody flody flody flody flod. f. 【 19m (a) flody flody f.) f.3m m.

C. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the respective entries and arguments in the evidence Nos. 19 through 22 and the purport of the entire pleadings, it is insufficient to recognize that the above acknowledged facts alone are defective in the instant machine, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

The plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

1 The quotation of this case only presents the specifications concerning the scope of the operation of the instant machine itself, but does not present the specifications of the product cut by the instant machine.

Therefore, it is true.

arrow