beta
Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 7,173,00; KRW 8,198,600; KRW 4,448,600; KRW 4,600; and KRW 4,448,60, respectively, to Plaintiff C.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition 1) H around 04:5 on July 12, 2016, 2016: (a) an I SP car (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).
A) A person driving his/her car and driving his/her car, which is in his/her jurisdiction in his/her jurisdiction, led to the rapid speed along the three-lanes of the cross-city bus terminal in the direction of the speed. At that time, the location is a private-distance intersection along which signals, etc. are installed, and the crosswalk was placed in the front section, and thus, there was a duty of care to ensure that the Defendant, who is engaged in driving a car, has a duty of care to show the right side and to prevent the occurrence of an accident by complying with the traffic signals. Nevertheless, H, due to negligence by failing to neglect it and by failing to enter the left-hand turn signal at the crosswalk, thereby walking along the crosswalk (hereinafter referred to as “the network”).
3) The Defendant’s vehicle was located on the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).
(2) As a result, the Deceased died on March 2, 2017, while hospitalized in a N Hospital and being treated for treatment by suffering from injury, such as a ductal flavosis and a non-ductal flavine flavous flavous flavosis, which requires approximately 13 weeks of treatment. (2) The Plaintiff is the deceased’s spouse, and the rest of the Plaintiffs are the deceased’s children, and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle.
[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-5, Eul evidence No. 3, the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the facts of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the deceased and the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the instant accident as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.
C. According to the above evidence and Gap evidence No. 18 (including paper numbers), the accident of this case occurred while the deceased crossing the road to the red signal of the crosswalk, and the deceased's negligence.