beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with labor of one year and six months and fine of three million won, Defendant B imprisonment with labor of one year and a fine of two million won, and Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A on April 9, 2015, the sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group deadly weapon, etc.) at the Gwangju District Court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months, and the sentence was finalized on April 17, 2015 and is currently under suspended sentence.
1. On August 23, 2016, Defendant A’s gambling Defendant access to “K” and “L” Internet gambling site using computers in JPC room located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju-gu, by using computers, and send KRW 600,000 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of Ma, which is the NAN.
In order to have M deposit the above money on the above gambling site, M paid cyber money equivalent to that amount.
In addition, the Defendant selected one of the “mangment” and “s even” of both sides of a bridge and received dividends equivalent to 1.95 times the amount of the cyber money sold at the face of the said cyber money, and, if not, made a “private bridge game” in the manner that the amount of the money distributed ceases to exist, received cash again into the said M’s agricultural bank account.
From Emble to September 22, 2016, the Defendant deposited 6,150,000 won throughout the period of the annexed crime list (1) and 12 times in total, and gambling.
2. On August 22, 2016, Defendant B’s gambling Defendant access to “L”, which is an Internet gambling site, by means of a computer, from JPC room located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangjubuk-gu, and then, Defendant B’s friendly facts charged are described as Defendant B’s dong branch, but as such, Defendant B’s friendly facts are written as mistake.
60,000 won shall be sent to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of M
In order to have M deposit the above money on the above gambling site, M paid cyber money equivalent to that amount.
In addition, the defendant selected one of the "many" and "s even" of both sides of the bridge and received dividends equivalent to 1.95 times the amount of the cyber money sold at the face of the above cyber money, and if not, he did so.