A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

International privileges, which have concealed 202 No. 1, Haba, Haba, which was seized.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

The Defendant: (a) was a person who resides in the place below Thailand (hereinafter referred to as Thailand); and (b) “one name-free drug, the name-free drug, shall be sent to the Republic of Korea; (c) the Defendant: (d) conspired to receive a smuggling imported; and (d) concealed the above name-free drug at the place below Thailand (hereinafter referred to as Thailand) around September 2016, into the Republic of Korea; and (d) sent the addressee to the Republic of Korea using an international special mail; (d) around 10:30 on September 24, 2016, the above international special grade mail arrived at the Incheon International Airport in the middle-gu, Incheon International Airport and sent it to the Republic of Korea using the international special mail; and (e) had the addressee undergo customs search.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with a name-free person, imported 202 well-known drugs, including Mespatha, which is a local mental medicine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect concerning G to the prosecution;

1. Records of seizure by prosecution (the 46th through 48th page of the investigation records);

1. Each investigation report (report on the result of conducting controlled delivery, and a copy of an international postal delivery slip sent to the defendant, a photograph attached to a copy of an international postal delivery slip, an alien registration certificate, and a passport attached thereto);

1. Requests for analysis of ingredients of suspected narcotics, response to the results of analysis;

1. 202 Detection photographs of the international express post of the Thailand;

1. Determination as to the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion

1. The summary of the argument is that the Defendant was aware of the international express postal items as indicated in the judgment, and did not know whether they had to have been included in the international express postal items as indicated in the judgment, and there was no intention to import the Defendant.

2. The determination is based on each of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court as follows.