1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff (appointed party) A KRW 41,200,00, KRW 24,200,000 for the appointed party E, and KRW 24,20,00 for the appointed party F.

1. Facts premised on ① Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) were the heads of the Defendant church.

② On December 22, 2017, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party A) representing the Plaintiffs, the president of the Defendant church, Q, and the general affairs R prepared and notarized the agreement angle (hereinafter “instant agreement angle”).

At the time of the preparation of the letter of agreement in this case, the director general of the defendant church was present, and the representative of the defendant church was a temporary member of the church.

③ The main contents of the instant memorandum of agreement are as follows.

The plaintiffs, as the members of the defendant church, are in the position of U pastors, by January 13, 2018, who moved to a VG association by January 31, 2018. The defendant church, among the plaintiffs, shall pay the following amount by January 31, 2018 to the plaintiffs whose two titles have been completed: The street (appointed E, F, andO) established before 2008,00 won for the additional funeral expenses per capita; and the street (Ba), which was established after 20,000 won per capita, including funeral expenses, - 20,000 won per capita, including funeral expenses, - 20,000 won per person per head as the second name of the VG association and the VGnamnamnam Development Fund, and 120,000 won per person per admission to the VG association,

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 9, and 10, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the statements in the evidence Nos. 3 through 6 (including the provisional number), and witness Q, S, and T’s testimony of the cause of the claim, the letter of agreement in this case was prepared according to the report received by the representative of the defendant church at the time of the formation of the agreement and the entrustment of the authority to prepare the letter of agreement to the chairman, Q. Q, and Q. The letter of agreement in this case was prepared according to the delegation of the authority to prepare the letter of agreement to the chairman, Q., etc. of the defendant church. The letter of agreement in this case is based on the premise that the validity of the letter of agreement in this case is recognized, notwithstanding the dissenting opinion of the defendant church, which is the representative of the defendant church as the temporary pastor in the defendant church, as the temporary pastor in the defendant church