logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.11.26 2019고단4347
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On February 7, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of assault, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court on February 7, 2014, 8 months in the same court on February 9, 2017, and 1 year in the Seoul Southern District Court on November 7, 2018, and completed the execution of the final sentence in the Ansan Prison on July 25, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On October 3, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc.) (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes), around

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. On October 7, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 20:55 on October 7, 2019, at a danran bar operated by the victim D in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant was able to talk with the said main points, and then put the satis, without any particular reason, about 10 minutes, such as “satisfing,” and “satisfing......................, the Defendant, who interfered with the business, was unable to respond to the other customers by the victim’s satisfing the victim’s chest..”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's bar business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police statement concerning B and D;

1. Bluckings, video CDs, and photograph of a major fluore photograph;

1. Judgment.

arrow