The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below against the defendant in light of the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment and one year of short term, eight months) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is likely to lead to a serious crime, in light of the circumstances following the crime, such as the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, the partial recovery of checks among damaged articles, the fact that the defendant is a juvenile, and the crime of this case that stolen money and valuables by intrusion upon another person's residence in favor of the defendant at night, such as the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and the circumstances after the crime are not good. In light of the fact that the defendant received juvenile protective disposition several times due to the crime, such as special larceny, night-time theft, etc., and the crime of this case was committed during the period of probation for which three months have not yet passed since the defendant was discharged from juvenile protective facilities, considering the fact that there is a need to correct the habit of crime by isolation from society, the fact that the defendant did not agree with the victim, and all other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.