The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below against the defendant in light of the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the fact that the defendant made a confession of all the crimes in this case and the total amount of damage caused by the crime in this case is KRW 408,00,00, and the records of punishment due to larceny, fraud, etc., it is judged that the defendant has a criminal habitive wall against the defendant. In light of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's isolation from society, there is a need to correct such criminal habitive wall, the defendant did not agree with the victims and did not make any effort to recover the damage, the dwelling of the defendant is not fixed, there is no special change of circumstances after the judgment of the court below, and all other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.