A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 11. 9. 03:40경 울산 남구 B에 있는 울산남부경찰서 C지구대에서, 폭행사건 피혐의자로 조사를 받기 위하여 대기하던 중, 폭행사건 상대방 측 사람들과 계속하여 이야기를 하려고 하여 위 지구대 소속 경위 D가 “분리 조사가 필요하니, 안쪽에 있는 사무실로 가자.”고 말하여 피고인을 다른 곳으로 데려가려고 하자, 위 D에게 “씹할, 놔라“라고 소리치면서 발로 위 D의 허벅지를 1회 찼다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate performance of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence is determined as per the disposition, comprehensively taking account of all the following factors: (a) the basic area (6-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence] under the influence of alcohol; (b) the basic area (6-1-1 year and April) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence); (c) the fact that it did not lead to a serious result; (d) the fact that the mistake was contrary to the defendant's age, character,