A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 2, 2014, at around 00:23, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in front of Ulsan-gu B, Ulsan-gu; (b) and (c) stated that, “I would like to see why I would like to see why I would like to see why I would like to see, what I would like to see, why I would like to see, why I would like to see, what I would like to see, what I would like to see, what I would like to see, what I would like to see, what I would like to see, what I would like to see, what I would like to see, what I would see

From the above E, the Defendant: (a) heard the words “I shall not go to the right side of the E”; (b) exceeded the mother and child of the above E; and (c) “I am back to the inner seat”; and (d) took the front side of the E at one time with the hand floor.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the crime prevention patrol, which is a legitimate execution of official duties of the above E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area of obstruction of performance of official duties (fence of performance of official duties/performance of duties) (fence of June-1 and April) / [decision of sentence] The punishment of a fine for the same kind of crime was not long and long, and the crime was committed again, and the quality and normal conditions of the crime are not good due to the bad appearance and transfer of the crime. However, there was no past record of the crime other than a fine once, and the degree of the assault was not much serious, and the punishment was determined as per the disposition by comprehensively taking account of the records such as age, occupation, home environment, personality and conduct.